Scientists insist that evolution is true b/c there's all kinds of bones found all over of animals that resemble but are not identical to animals alive & well in today's ecosystem. People say that this is evidence of natural selection but not evolution.
Ok, here's the problem. Dino digger's "anti-science" discovery makes no sense unless you adjust common scientific theory to allow for the possibility that most human bones from the dinosaur days are nothing more than dust by now and that the dinosaur bones have survived as long as they have because there was more bone that has since disintegrated. Otherwise, where's all the other human bones that carbon date with dino days? Going under that logic, natural selection doesn't explain these bones that look like space zebras et al. If you consider "all life was created at the same time", then you have the puzzle: 1) what killed these animals? They couldn't have lasted very long if they weren't fit for survival to begin with. Some other animal either killed them off all too easily or they were a weakly designed species that couldn't take the heat. Which brings 2) If the average human bones are dead and gone (disintegrated), then why are these relatively small creatures' bones being found? The Bible says the earth was created in 7 days. If you want a "pro-science" alignment of this fact, watch THE GENESIS CODE. It's a movie, not sure if anyone famous was in it. One of the characters, a scientist, in the movie explains rather convincingly and articulately that from God's viewpoint, the events described in the first verses of The Bible probably took what seemed like 7 days to him because, for all intensive purposes, he was in "outer space", and time is measured differently from Earth than it is in space -- any details beyond that, you'll have to watch the movie or look it up and find an excerpt, 'cause I only vaugely understood what the dude was saying and I don't remember all the details because, like I said, I only vagugely understood all of it........but as I was saying, if the events in the first few passages of The Bible are to be taken with that interpretation, it makes perfect sense to think that the complicated process of evolution had time to hammer out. As the Pope of now said, paraphrasing, The Big Bang Theory doesn't disprove the existence of God, but, to the contrary, requires it. I'd say the same thing about the idea of evolution. People say that the odds of the big bang being a reality are zero to none. And in Ben Stein's documentary that i don't remember the name of he was making fun of this one scientist for saying something like it's possible that the process of evolution began from the backs of crystals. I'm probably way off in my memory of what the guy said, he was answering rhetorical questions from Ben Stein -- I say rhetorical b/c Ben Stein made it clear in the narration of the documentary that he thinks the idea of evolution is absurd and no answer from anybody would be sound enough to satisfy Mr. Stein. Obviously the majority if not all the pro-evolution scientists Mr. Stein spoke to refuse to acknowledge the possibility of intelligent design. To me, that's what's really mind boggling -- that so many people think the universe just happened and continues to roll on like an undying death. As post-rock gurus Explosions In The Sky once declared: THE EARTH IS NOT A COLD DEAD PLACE!
No comments:
Post a Comment